9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (11) TMI 560X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nalty - HELD THAT:- This Court by interim order dated 26.03.2010 had granted stay of payment of penalty and also the fact that the issues which arise in this appeal were a subject matter of controversy up to this Court and thereafter settled in the case of COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE VERSUS M/S GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD. THROUGH ITS SECRETARY [ 2018 (5) TMI 915 - SUPREME COURT] and also the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA For the Appellant : Mr. Aniruddha Deshmukh, Adv. Mrs. Sheela Goel, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR Mr. Prahlad Singh, Adv. Mr. V.C. Bharthi, Adv. Mrs. Gargi Khanna, Adv. Mr. H.R. Rao, Adv. Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Adv. Mrs. Alka Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv. ORDER We have heard learned counsel Mr. Aniruddha Deshm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ourt had granted an order of stay with regard to payment of penalty. Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent-department has brought to our notice communication dated 03.11.2023 stating that the principal amount of Rs.69,650/- has been tendered by the appellant but interest calculated up to date of deposit is Rs.82,955/- and the same has not been deposited although, the interim stay of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on the issue of payment of penalty. We take note of the submissions of learned counsel for the appellant and learned senior counsel for the respondent-department and also the fact that this Court by interim order dated 26.03.2010 had granted stay of payment of penalty and also the fact that the issues which arise in this appeal were a subject matter of controversy up to this Court and thereafter s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
