9911796707
TMI Blog2023 (9) TMI 1404X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... HELD THAT:- Upon examination of the order passed by this Court, it appears that though the order was passed on 14.08.2023, it was placed before the Special Magistrate only on 22.08.2023, when the warrant of arrest had already been issued on 19.08.2023. Therefore, it is opined that the respondent cannot be prima facie found guilty of having acted in contempt of order dated 14.08.2023, as the warra ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tition has been filed by the petitioner, who is aggrieved by the alleged in action on the part of the Authority which according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, has not acted in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an order was passed by this Court on 14.08.2023, whereby in paragraph No. 3, this Court has given the liberty to the petitioner to appear be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... that the respondent cannot be prima facie found guilty of having acted in contempt of order dated 14.08.2023, as the warrant of arrest was issued even before the said order was placed before the Authority. However, learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that an application for recall of the NBW has been filed by the petitioner before the Authority on 24.08.2023. Under the circumstance ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
