Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (1) TMI 133

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ses is required to be added in the assessable value for the purpose of levy of Central Excise duty. By relying on the above decision of the Hon ble Supreme Court, the sales tax concession retained by the Appellant is required to be added in the assessable value for the purpose of levy of Central Excise duty. The Appellant has agreed for the payment of duty for the normal period of limitation.. The Appellant has not suppressed any information from the department - As there is no evidence of suppression of facts available on record, we hold that the demand confirmed by invoking the extended period is liable to be set aside. Penalty - HELD THAT:- The Appellant submits that they have not suppressed any information from the department. T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sed penalty of Rs. 20,41,472/- under Section 11AC of the CEA, 1944. Aggrieved against the impugned order, the Appellant has filed this appeal. 2. In their grounds of appeal, the Appellant submits that the Hon ble Supreme Court has decided the issue in the matter of Super Synotex (India) Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur II, reported in 2014 (301) ELT 273 wherein it has been held that the sales tax concession retained by the assesses is required to be added in the assessable value for the purpose of levy of Central Excise duty. However, Board has issued Circular No. 1063/2/2018-CX dated 16.02.2018 and clarified that extended period shall not be invoked in such cases. Following the Board Circular, this Bench also decided simil .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of limitation and accordingly prayed for setting aside the demand confirmed by invoking the extended period. They also prayed for setting aside the penalties imposed. 6. We observe that the issue involved in the present appeal is regarding includability of the sales tax concession retained by the Appellant in the assessable value for the purpose of levy of Central Excise duty. We observe that the issue is no more res integra as the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Super Synotex (India) Ltd. Vs CCE, Jaipur reported in 2014 (301) ELT 273, has held that the sales tax concession retained by the assesses is required to be added in the assessable value for the purpose of levy of Central Excise duty. By relying on the above decision of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for imposing penalty under Section 11AC. Accordingly, we hold that the penalty imposed under Section 11AC not tenable. 9. Further, we observe that Board has issued Circular No. 1063/2/2018- CX dated 16.02.2018, clarifying acceptance of some of the orders passed by the Hon ble Supreme Court, High Courts etc., wherein no review petition has been filed. The para 12 of the said Circular relevant to this appeal is reproduced below: Decision of the Hon ble High Court of Punjab Haryana dated 12.08.2016 in the case of Microtek Forgings CEANo. 32/2016 [2016-TIOL-1866-HC-P HCX]. 12.1 Department has accepted the order of the Hon ble High Court where the Hon ble Court replying on the judgment of the Apex Court in the matters of 'Maruti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ss account and balance sheet of the impugned periods. Accordingly, by following the above Circular issued by the Board, we hold that extended period not invocable in this case and for the same reason penalty under Section 11AC of the CEA, 1944 also not imposable. 11. In view of the above discussion, we partially allow the appeal filed by the Appellant and dispose of the appeal on the following terms: (i) The Appellant is liable to pay duty for the normal period of limitation. The demand confirmed by invoking the extended period of limitation is set aside. (ii) The penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the CEA, 1944 is set aside. (iii) The appeal is disposed by way of remand for calculating the duty, payable for the normal period .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates