9911796707
TMI Blog2022 (4) TMI 1583X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nting several adjournments to the petitioners, petitioners did not contest the case - HELD THAT:- Petitioners plea of Covid-19 is not tenable, since the impugned order dated 31st July, 2019, was received by the petitioners on August 8, 2019, which was not in the Covid-19 period, and not only that, this Court has been functioning normally even for more than last six months. Furthermore, since ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed order of the Revisional Authority dated 31st July, 2019 dismissing the revisional application of the petitioners and on perusal of which I find the reasons for dismissal are that the said application was time barred and secondly that several adjournments were granted to the petitioners. In spite of granting several adjournments to the petitioners, petitioners did not contest the case. Even this ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 0 crores in a year, it must have been a team of professionals to handle its legal affairs. Petitioners cannot take the plea of being a lay man staying in a remote village by taking advantage of such type of plea in approaching the Writ Court. Since it is a court of equity and it is for those who are diligent and vigilant and not for the slumberers over their rights. Considering the facts and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
