9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (1) TMI 281X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the petitioner for the month of December 2022 and January 2023 on 30.04.2023 and for the month of February 2023 on 24.06.2023. In the present case, since the petitioner had not filed the returns for the months of December 2022, January 2023 and February 2023 within the prescribed time limit, the assessment order has been passed by the respondent under Section 62(1) of the GST Act on 28.03.2023 and 10.04.2023. In terms of the provisions of Section 62(2) of the GST Act, if a registered person furnishes the valid returns within a period of 30 days of the service of assessment order under Sub-section (1) of Section 62 of the GST Act, the said assessment order would be deemed to have been withdrawn. However, the liability for the paymen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ver, in the present case, no such application was filed by the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to file an application for condonning the delay in filing the returns within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order - Upon filing of the application for condonnation of delay, the respondent is directed to consider the said application and pass orders by taking into consideration of the reasons provided by the petitioner for non-filing of returns within a period of 30 days from the service of best judgement assessment order and thereafter, permit the petitioner to file the revised returns. Petition disposed off. - Hon'ble Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy For the Petitioner : Mr.Adithya Reddy ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... elay in filing the returns due to financial difficulties faced by the petitioner. Hence, he prays this Court to condone the said delay and quash the impugned assessment orders passed by the respondent. 5. In reply, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent would submit that only if the returns were filed within a period of 30 days from the date on which the best judgement assessment orders were served, the petitioner is certainly entitled to avail the benefit, which is available under Section 62(2) of the GST Act. However, in the present case, the returns were not filed by the petitioner within the prescribed time limit. Hence, she requested this Court to pass appropriate orders. 6. Heard the learned counsel for the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... be deemed to have been withdrawn but the liability for payment of interest under sub section (1) of section 50 or for payment of late fee under section 47 shall continue. 9. A reading of the above provision would make it clear that if any registered person fails to furnish the returns under Section 39 of the Act, a proper officer may proceed to assess the tax liability of the said person to the best of his judgement taking into account all the relevant materials, which are available or which he has gathered and pass an assessment order within a period of 5 years from the date specified under Section 44 of the Act for furnishing of the annual return for the financial year, in which the tax was not paid. 10. In the present case, sinc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he best judgement assessment order within a period of 5 years from the end of financial year, for which the registered person is liable to file the annual returns. In the present case, the relevant financial year is pertaining to 31.03.2023, in which case, the petitioner is liable to file the annual returns on or before 31.12.2023. Therefore, the said period of 5 years to make the best judgement assessment order for the respondent will start on 01.01.2024 and ends on 31.12.2029. In such case, if the best judgement assessment order is passed by the respondent on 31.12.2029, which is permissible under Section 74 of the GST Act, the petitioner can file his returns within a period of 30 days therefrom i.e., on or before 30.01.2030. Hence, the t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d any returns within a period of 30 days from the date of best judgement assessment order. Thus, if any application is filed before the Authority concerned with sufficient reasons for non-filing of returns within the prescribed time limit as per section 62(2) of the Act, the same shall be considered on merits. If the Authority is satisfied with the said reasons, they can condone the delay and permit the petitioner to file the returns. However, in the present case, no such application was filed by the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is inclined to pass the following orders: (i) The petitioner is directed to file an application for condonning the delay in filing the returns within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
