TMI BlogChallenges in corporate insolvency, particularly when dealing with contract terminations and arbitration proceedingsX X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nsal, the liquidator of Isolux Corsan India Engineering Construction Pvt. Ltd., and SOMA-Indus Varanasi Aurangabad Tollway Pvt. Ltd. (formerly SOMA Isolux Varanasi Aurangabad Tollway Pvt. Ltd.). Key Points of the Case: Background : The case arises from a dispute between Isolux Corsan India Engineering Construction Pvt. Ltd. (the Corporate Debtor) and SOMA-Indus Varanasi Aurangabad To ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on under Section 66 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. This was challenged by the Liquidator in the appellate tribunal. The document outlines the arguments presented by both parties: The Liquidator argued that the invocation of bank guarantees by the Concessionaire was wrongful and fraudulent. The Concessionaire contended that since the Liquidator had already sought to initiate a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Suggestion: Analysis of CA Rajeev Bansal's Appeal in Isolux Corsan Case: Navigating Legal Complexities in Corporate Insolvency This case highlights the intricate legal challenges in corporate insolvency, particularly when dealing with contract terminations and arbitration proceedings. The Tribunal's decision underscores the importance of streamlined legal proceedings and the careful c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|