9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (2) TMI 146X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iven the benefit of this declaration without the need to take their grievances to Court. Applying this principle to the present case, it was the duty of the Respondents to extend the benefit of the Order dated 18-2-2022 to the Petitioner herein without expecting that every candidate who has secured more than 50 marks in the oral examination must run to this Court to obtain a declaration in their favour. The Respondents are directed to issue Customs Brokers License to the Petitioner herein in light of the Order dated 18-2-2022, which has attained finality - Petition allowed. - SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J. Shri Devender Kumar Saini, Advocate, for the Petitioner. Shri Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Sarvan Kumar, GP, Aditya Sing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mination and as per the prevailing rules he applied for second attempt of oral examination. It is stated that vide letter dated 30-4-2019 he was called to appear for second attempt of oral examination which was to be held on 25-5-2019. It is stated that in the said oral examination the Petitioner got 52 marks and, therefore, as per the procedure, the Petitioner was entitled to get the Customs Brokers License. However, the Petitioner was not granted the license on the ground that the rules had been changed mid-way and the minimum marks required to clear the oral examination has been increased to 60. 3. Material on record discloses that certain candidates, who scored between 50-60 marks in the oral examination, approached this Court by fil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... W.P. (C) 13132/2019, to the Petitioner herein and the Respondents could not have restricted the benefits only to those persons who had approached this Court and had secured a declaration of law in their favour. 5. Challenging the rejection of his candidature, the Petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition. 6. Heard the Counsel for the parties and perused the material on record. 7. Admittedly, the Petitioner herein cleared the first round of examination and he was unsuccessful in clearing the oral examination in the first round and as per the norms he applied for second round of oral examination which he cleared by securing 52 marks in it. The Respondents herein denied Customs Brokers License to cand ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
