9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (2) TMI 252X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... MEMBER ( JUDICIAL ) , MR. RAMESH NAIR And HON'BLE MEMBER ( TECHNICAL ) , MR. RAJU Shri Vivek Bapat , Advocate for the Appellant Shri Anoop Kumar Mudvel , Superintendent ( AR ) for the Respondent ORDER RAMESH NAIR The issues involved in the present case is that whether the appellant is liable to pay 5%/6% on the value of exempted goods (i.e. Sodium Chloride 'salt') in terms Rule 6(3) of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ect of any inputs used in processing of Sodium Chloride. The process of Sodium Chloride is only purification of Salt, which does not involve any cenvatable input. 2.1 As regard the common input service, he submits that the appellant was under bonafide belief that since they have not availed any Cenvat credit on the input they are not required to pay 5%/6% of the value of exempted goods. He furthe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he above submission, the appellant are entitled for the refund. In support of his submission, he placed reliance on the following judgments:- Pragathi Concrete Products Pvt. Ltd.- 2015 (322) ELT 819 (SC) Garrison Polysacks Pvt. Ltd.- 2013 (292) ELT 513 (Tri.- Ahmd.) Urja Engineers Ltd. - 2014 (11) TMI 157 CESTAT Ahmedabad DSCL Sugar Ltd.- 2015 (10) TMI 566 (SC) Balrampur Chini Mills Ltd. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (3) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 shall not sustain. 4.1 We find that since the appellant has undertaken to reverse the proportionate credit of common input service attributed to the exempted goods i.e. Sodium Chloride, the demand of 5%/6% under Rule 6(3) of Cenvat credit Rules, 2004 shall not sustain subject to complying their said undertaking. 4.2 We find that the appellant also made out a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
