Tribunal Rejects Evidence Due to Lack of Cross-Examination, Highlights Importance of Section 9D Compliance.

Clandestine removal - Tar Catcher - The tribunal found that the statements were relied upon as corroborative evidences and the cross-examination of witnesses who made such statements was denied without valid ground. It is found that, the admissibility of these evidences is legally not sustainable - The procedure, as prescribed under Section 9D, has to be followed scrupulously. - The tribunal set aside the demand. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X