9911796707
TMI Blog2021 (12) TMI 1484X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was in operation, was given to his client - HELD THAT:- Petitioner might approach the Tribunal to contend that impugned order be amended on the Tribunal not having allowed his client to adduce evidence of the company being in operation, in context of the report having said that his client may be put to strict proof. If the Tribunal is satisfied, it may amend impugned order. The amendment can be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ated 16th March, 2020, wherein it was mentioned that: Petitioner may be put to strict proof of the contention made therein that at the time of its striking off the Company was in operation. He submits, on that his client wants impugned order to be set aside for his client s application being restored, for NCLT to allow his client to explain and provide proof that the company was in oper ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... me within two years from the date of the order, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed by it, and shall make such amendment, if the mistake is brought to its notice by the parties; Provided that no such amendment shall be made in respect of any order against which an appeal has been preferred under this act. (3) The Tribunal shall send a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
