9911796707
Advanced Search 
TMI Blog2024 (2) TMI 1031X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ara Praksah , Deputy Commissioner ( AR ) for the Respondent ORDER RAMESH NAIR The brief facts of the case are that the Appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Bicycle parts. For manufacturing of the aforesaid subject products, the Appellant imports unfinished rough cold forge as raw material to be used the same in the manufacturing of the subject goods. During the course of assessment of bil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... regarded that the condition of the goods at the time of import which is a material factor for the purposes of ascertaining the heading under which such goods shall be classified. He takes support of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dunlop India v. UOI 1983 ELT 1556 (SC) and GLAXO Laboratories Ltd. 1985 (21) ELT 72 in this regard. He further submits that the said goods are required to f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cided in the present case is whether the said subject goods shall be classified as Bicycle Parts under chapter heading 8714 as upheld by the Adjudicating Authorities or under chapter heading 73269099 as claimed by the Appellant. The headings have been extracted below for ease of reference: - CTH Heading Heading Description BCD IGST 8714 Parts and accessories of vehicles of heading Nos. 87.1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... essing to attain essential character of bicycle parts. 4.2 We observe that for the purposes of classifying subject goods under chapter heading 8714 it needs to fulfill the criteria of having essential characteristics of the finished product. We observe that in order to aid classification it needs to be first decided whether the said product appeared to have represented any bicycle part for which, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
