Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (4) TMI 2

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... quashing the entries in revenue record as depicted in Nakal Jamabandi for the year 2016-2017 (Annexure P-5 of CWP No. 2719 of 2022) has been allowed by referring judgment passed in Civil Appeal No. 2169 of 2012, titled as Punjab National Bank vs. Union Bank of India & others, reported in (2022) 7 SCC 260: AIR 2022 SC 1475. 2. Respondent No. 1-petitioner Himanshu Prashar participated in e-Auction conducted by and on behalf of Punjab National Bank, for selling of assets of M/s Gilvert ISPAT Pvt. Ltd. in accordance with law and provisions of SARFAESI Act read with Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002. By offering highest price bid of an amount of Rs. 6,38,00,000/-, he deposited the Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) on 21.09.2021. Vide commu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e was created in favour of Excise and Taxation Department on the property owned by M/s Gilvert ISPAT Pvt. Ltd., for outstanding arrears of Rs. 50,35,56,792/-. It is also noticeable that prior to that vide Rapat No. 171, dated 29.01.2015 entire property was attached in favour of respondent No. 2-Punjab National Bank. 5. As recorded by learned Single Judge issue involved in the matter is as to whether appellant State/Excise Department will be having first charge upon the property of M/s Gilvert ISPAT Pvt. Ltd., in terms of provisions of Section 26 of the H.P. VAT Act, 2005 or secured creditor Punjab National Bank shall have priority to recover over any other charge, including charge in favour of State, in terms of provisions of Recovery of D .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l authority. 34. Act to have overriding effect.-(1) Save as provided under sub-section (2), the provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any law other than this Act. (2) The provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of, the Industrial Finance Corporation Act, 1948 (15 of 1948), the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (63 of 1951), the Unit [Trust of India Act, 1963 (52 of 1963)] [Now see the Unit Trust of India (Transfer of Undertaking and Repeal) Act, 2002 (58 of 2002).], the Industrial Reconstruction Bank of India Act, 1984 ( .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... provision in either of the Central enactments containing a similar/parallel provision of a first charge in favour of the bank as was there in State enactments creating first charge in favour of the State. This judgment was passed on the basis of provisions prevailing at that point of time. Now by insertion of Section 31-B in RDB Act and Section 26E in SARFAESI Act, facts and circumstances have changed. Noticing the aforesaid changed circumstances, Kerala High Court in State of Bank of India's case referred supra, has decided that secured creditor/bank shall have priority for recovery than to the recovery of tax notwithstanding any statutory first charge created in favour of Revenue by enacting the State Act. 12. It is apt to record that in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd Section 31-B in RDB Act and in such a situation provisions of Central Act will prevail entitling the bank to have priority to recover. 17. In similar matters a Coordinate Division Bench of this High Court dismissed the appeals of the State of Himachal Pradesh in LPA No 156 of 2021 alongwith LPAs No. 158, 159, 161, 163, 164, 170, 171, 176, 177, 182, 201 of 2021, 25 of 2022, 23 and 65 of 2023, vide judgment dated 12.04.2023. 18. Taking into consideration facts and circumstances of the case and also statutory provisions discussed supra, we are of the considered opinion that learned Single Judge has not committed any mistake, irregularity, illegality or perversity in allowing CWP No. 2719 of 2022 preferred by respondent No. 1- petitioner H .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates