Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (4) TMI 286

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n and has passed a cryptic order - under declaration of output tax - excess claim Input Tax Credit - ITC claimed from cancelled dealers - return defaulters - tax non-payers - HELD THAT:- The impugned order, however, after recording the narration, records that the reply uploaded by the taxpayer is insufficient and unsatisfactory. The impugned order does not specifically deal with the reply dated 23 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... DUDEJA Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Mahna, Mr. Ramanand Roy, Mr. Mithlesh Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Mayank Kouts, Mr. Shiva Narang and Mr. Silky Wadhwa, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Samridhi Vats, Advocate JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 25.12.2023, whereby the impugned Show Cause Notice dated .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... payers. To the said Show Cause Notice, a detailed reply was furnished by the petitioner giving disclosures under each of the heads. 4. The impugned order, however, after recording the narration, records that the reply uploaded by the taxpayer is insufficient and unsatisfactory. It merely states that And whereas, the Taxpayer filed reply/explanation on dated 23.10.2023 and 26.10.2023. And whereas, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... GST registration. The same was found not satisfactory as per the detail given below. The Proper Officer has opined that the reply is insufficient and unsatisfactory. 5. The impugned order does not specifically deal with the reply dated 23.10.2023 given by the petitioner, however, refers to certain judgment to hold that the burden to prove admissibility of any input tax credit cannot be shifted to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... urther documents, petitioner shall file the same within two weeks from today in support of his reply to the Show Cause Notice and thereafter the Proper Officer shall re-adjudicate the Show Cause Notice after giving an opportunity of personal hearing and shall pass a fresh speaking order in accordance with law within the period prescribed under Section 75(3) of the Act. 8. It is clarified that this .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates