TMI Blog2016 (5) TMI 1616X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g was served upon the assessee twice but none appeared on behalf of assessee nor any application has been filed for seeking adjournment. This shows that the assessee is not interested in pursuing with his appeal. Therefore, in view of the decision of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar [ 1996 (3) TMI 92 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] and Multiplan India (Pvt.) Ltd. [ 1991 (5) TMI 120 - ITAT DELHI-D] we ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ring on 05.05.2016 (AD-evidence on record). At the time of hearing, none appeared on behalf of assessee nor any application has been filed for seeking adjournment. This shows that the assessee is not interested in pursuing with his appeal. Therefore, in view of the decision of Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 (M.P.) and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|