1999 (1) TMI 550

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... la Ltd. The appellant has extensive land but very proximally to the Vadyasala of the appellant there existed a kidikidappu, a land which belongs to the appellant. As the site of the said kudikidappu was found to be inconvenient to the appellant, an application was made before the Land Tribunal under Section 75(2) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 (for short :the Act ) for shifting the kudikidap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... below. The matter is therefore required to be reconsidered. 3. Nonetheless learned Single Judge allowed the revision which means that the orders of the Land Tribunal and the appellate authority were set aside. 4. Learned Counsel for the appellant contended that the jurisdiction of the High Court in revision is very much limited as indicated in Section 103 of the Act. Sub-section (1) reads thus; 10 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at no question of law whatsoever has been formulated before the High Court and there is no finding that the Tribunal or the appellate authority has either decided a question of law erroneously or has failed to decide a question of law. Hence, we are of the considered view that learned Single Judge has acted without jurisdiction in interfering with the orders of the Land Tribunal and the appellate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X