9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (6) TMI 742X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY For the Petitioner : Mrs.V.Vijayalakshmi For the R1 : Mr. V. Prashanth Kiran, Govt. Adv. (T) ORDER By these four writ petitions, orders in original pertaining to assessment periods 2017-2018 to 2020-2021 are challenged on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demands on merits. 2. The petition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rders impugned herein, the bank account of the petitioner was attached and a sum of Rs.4,44,025/- was appropriated therefrom. According to her, this amount would cover a substantial portion of 10% of the disputed tax demand. On instructions, she submits that the petitioner would make good the short fall between the amount appropriated and 10% of the disputed tax demand. 4. Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... x demands on merits. 6. For reasons aforesaid, the impugned orders are set aside subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand in respect of each assessment period as agreed to after giving credit to the sum of Rs.4,44,025/- appropriated from the petitioner's bank account. Such remittance shall be made within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
