9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (7) TMI 601X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Respondent : Mr. J.K. Jayaselan Government Advocate ORDER Heard Mr.G.Natarajan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.J.K.Jayaselan, learned Government Advocate for the respondent. 2. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2017-18. 3. The petitioner was issued with a show cause notice in DRC-01 on 29 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... show cause notice or attend during personal hearing. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given one opportunity to explain the case, as bulk of the demand for a sum of Rs. 1,51,78,828/- is wholly un-sustainable. As far as the other demand is concerned, the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be able to convince the Department based on the submission ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent. 9. Having perused the impugned order and having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondent, I am of the view that this is a fit case for remanding the case back by setting aside the impugned order subject to the petitioner depositing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
