9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (8) TMI 723X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Puneet Bali, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv. Ms. S. Lakshmi Iyer, Adv. Ms. Kajal Dalal, Adv. Mr. Aditya Soni, Adv. Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Suryaprakash V.Raju, A.S.G. Ms. Sairica Raju, Adv. Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Adv. Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Somiran Sharma, Adv. Mr. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... has got efficacious alternative remedies traceable in law, to proceed against respondent nos.1 to 3 or any other person found to be involved in the alleged offences. The appellant-ED can, for such purpose, initiate appropriate independent proceedings notwithstanding the impugned judgments rendered by the High Courts of Bombay and Delhi. It seems to us that the appellant-ED, besides any other remed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... oduced above, it would cause severe prejudice to the reviewpetitioners as they will be deprived of their right to oppose the very maintainability of such a complaint and/or to challenge the adverse order, if any, passed therein. 5. Per contra, Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General of India submits that in view of the decision of this Court in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs. Union of In ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... olicitor General of India for the E.D. and keeping in mind the well settled principle that a Court order causes prejudice to none, we deem it appropriate to modify/clarify para 15 of the order dated 12.02.2024 to the extent that the said order shall not be construed to have held that a complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. is maintainable at the instance of E.D. Whether such a complaint is mainta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
