9911796707
TMI Blog1976 (10) TMI 3X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as, has referred the following question of law for the opinion of this court : " Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that 50% of the value of the two house properties at Somasundaram Colony and at Ellis Road, Madurai, should not be included in the dutiable estate of the deceased ? " One Dr. T. R. Muthurangam died on October 29, 1 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... se two properties in the dutiable estate of Dr.Muthurangam on the ground that he owned 50% beneficial interest in the said two items of properties. However, on appeal preferred by the accountable person, the Appellate CED deleted the 50% value of these properties holding that the entire properties belonged to Mrs. Girija Bai. The Asst. CED preferred an appeal to the Tribunal and the Tribunal held ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e two circumstances on which reliance has been placed on behalf of the revenue. The Tribunal has, in our opinion, very rightly pointed out that these circumstances will have no value whatever. Even if a part of the earnings of the husband had gone into the acquisition of the properties in question, the real question for consideration is whether the husband retained any beneficial interest in the p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ect to be taken note of is that even during the lifetime of Dr.Muthurangam, when Mrs. Girija Bai settled one of the properties in favour of her son on October 24, 1966, Dr. Muthurangam did not join in the execution of the settlement deed. If Dr. Muthurangam had any beneficial interest in the properties, he should have joined in the execution of the settlement deed. But the settlement deed was exec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
