9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (9) TMI 1237X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Rishi Matoliya, AOR For the Respondent : Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, A.S.G. Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR Mr. K Parmeshwaran, Adv. Mr. Alankar Gupta, Adv. Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Adv. Mr. Sarthak Karol, Adv. Mr. Rajendra Singh Rana, Adv. ORDER Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner. Leave granted. With the consent of learned senior counsel for the res ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er to contend that the impugned order has been passed by the High Court in the absence of the learned counsel for the appellant being heard. Although, his written submissions were on record, the same could not have been considered in the absence of learned counsel for the appellant being heard in the matter as the matter was concerning his liberty and freedom. He, therefore, submitted that an oppo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he said opportunity and is now seeking to protract the proceeding by seeking the negation of the impugned order which is just and proper. He therefore submitted that there is no merit in the arguments advanced by the learned senior counsel for the appellant and hence, the appeal may be dismissed. We have considered these submissions advanced at the Bar in light of what has been noted by the High ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , possibly the matter was again reserved and on 25.07.2024, the impugned order has been passed. The fact remains that the counsel for the appellant herein who had the advantage of an order of bail in his favour granted by the trial Court, was not heard in the matter and the impugned order of cancellation of bail was passed without hearing the counsel for the appellant herein. We find that there ha ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
