9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (9) TMI 1224X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... E MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Sankalp Todi Advocate For Respondent No. 2 For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Tanay Jain Advocate, through Video Conferencing. Mr. Sandeep Taneja Additional Advocate General with Ms. Kinjal Surana Advocate. ORDER PER 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the action of the respondents in provisionally attaching the bank a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that an objection to the provisional attachment is required to be decided within a reasonable time and it cannot be kept pending indefinitely. 3. Mr. Tanay Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 2 through video conferencing submits that the objection submitted by the petitioner would be decided as expeditiously as possible. 4. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion should be decided. However, the objection to the provisional attachment is required to be decided within a reasonable time and it cannot be kept pending indefinitely. Two months have already passed from the date of objection filed by the petitioner. The objections are required to be decided within a reasonable time and if the objections are kept pending for a long time without decision, it wou ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
