9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (5) TMI 1237X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... deposited by the employer - HELD THAT:- Since the deduction of TDS from the salaries of the petitioners is not disputed, we find no justification for the demands being shown as outstanding against the writ petitioners. We, accordingly, dispose of these three writ petitions. We additionally call upon the respondents to ensure that all demands with respect to TDS as currently reflected against the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ect Taxes [ CBDT ] dated 11 March 2016, passed the following orders insofar as the writ petitioners in WP(C) 3545/2023 and 3547/2023 are concerned. Those orders are reproduced hereinbelow: W.P.(C) 3545/2023 (Siddharth Arora) Sir/Madam/M/s. Subject: Online service of Orders Letter Stay of demand in the case of Siddharth Arora PANAHEPA8010H for the A.Y. 2021-22-reg. Kindly refer to your writ petitio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... granted and demand is restrained by holding no coercive action is being taken against the demands for the A.Y. 2021-22. W.P.(C) 3547/2023 (Ankit Vij) Sir/Madam/M/s. Subject: Online service of Orders Letter Stay of demand in the case of Ankit Vij, PAN: AHMPV9163C for the A.Y. 2020-21 2021-22-reg. Kindly refer to your writ petition filed before the Hon ble Delhi High Court against the intimation u/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... estrained by holding no coercive action is being taken against the demands for the A.Y. 2020-21 2021-22. 3. We note that the CBDT s OM of 11 March 2016 seeks to address this very issue. Since the deduction of TDS from the salaries of the petitioners is not disputed, we find no justification for the demands being shown as outstanding against the writ petitioners. 4. We, accordingly, dispose of thes ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
