9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (10) TMI 40X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iqui, Mr. T. Chamkraborty, Mr. S. Sanyal ..for the State ORDER 1. This intra court appeal by the writ petitioner is directed against an interim order dated 21st August, 2024 in WPA 9612 of 2024 by which the learned Single Bench while entertaining the writ petition challenging an order passed by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 (the Act) granted a stay of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Rs.2,58,536.80. However, while imposing the penalty the assessing officer imposed penalty on the sum of Rs.41,83,804.72. 5. This order was put to challenge by filing a statutory appeal. 6. Therefore, the appellate authority was required to consider as to whether the tax liability fixed by the adjudicating authority at Rs.2,58,536.80 is correct and whether the penalty is to be levied on the total ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssee had paid the tax. When this was pointed out by the department, the adjudicating authority, namely, the Assistant Commissioner of Revenue (WBGST) passed a closing order on 22.07.2024. 9. Therefore, the impact of the closing order on the present liability also has to be examined afresh. 10. The learned advocate for the appellant submitted that the adjudicating authority in its original order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... April, 2019 to March, 2020 for the same amount. 13. Accordingly, the appeal as well as the writ petition is allowed. The order passed by the appellate authority as well as the adjudicating authority is set aside and the matter stands remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration. 14. The appellant shall file a supplementary reply to the allegations to the show cause notice raisi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
