9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (10) TMI 550X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Act, 2017 - seeking release of intercepted goods - HELD THAT:- Although, it is true that the petitioners may have an alternative remedy before the appellate authority in respect of the challenge to the order passed under Section 129 (3) of the said Act, however, in the event, the petitioners intend to invoke their rights as provided under Section 129 (1) (a) of the said Act, the petitioners are e ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... able, there is no scope to entertain the writ petition, as regards such challenge. Petition disposed off. - RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J. For the Petitioners : Mr. Pranit Bag Ms. Rita Mukherjee Mr. Ghanshyam Jha Mr. Rowsan Kumar Jha. For the State : Mr. Anirban Ray, Ld. GP, Mr. T. M. Siddiqui Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty Mr. Saptak Sanyal. 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... diqui, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents would submit that the instant writ petition is not maintainable. The petitioners have no locus to maintain the same. It is submitted that the entire transaction is fictitious. In any event, the petitioners have also not filed any application by invoking the provisions of Section 129 (1) (a) of the said Act. He stil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o so. However, in the instant case, there appears to be no formal application filed by the petitioners for invoking the provisions of Section 129 (1) (a) of the said Act. 6. In view thereof, and taking into consideration the submissions made by Mr. Bag, I permit the petitioners to apply before the respondents by invoking the provisions of Section 129 (1) (a) of the said Act subject to the petition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
