9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (10) TMI 1244X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... time limitation - HELD THAT:- A perusal of the order indicates that the appeal was dismissed as the document which were required to be filed were not filed and the appellant was not even present before the appellate authority. Considering the provisions contained in Section 107(8) read with relevant rules and there being no provision to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and following the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... For the Petitioner : Shivendra S Singh Rathore, Abhishek Upadhyay, Bhavesh Chandel, Radhika Kheria,Rishabh Chauhan,Sachin Upadhyay, Utkarsh Misra For the Respondent : C.S.C. ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 20.01.2024 whereby the appeal preferred by the p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... prosecution and following the judgment of this court in the case of Rajdhani Arms Corporation (supra), the impugned order dated 20.01.2024 is set aside. The appellate authority is directed to pass a fresh order in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. To avoid any further delay, it is directed that the petitioner shall be present himself or through his a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
