9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (2) TMI 2115X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d loan was obtained. Thus, the trial Court has taken a decision on the basis of plaint averments itself and was not impressed with any factual defence taken by the bank. The trial Court rejected the plaint in the teeth of Section 34 of the SARFASI Act. The trial court has rightly considered the plaint averments on the anvil of Section 34 of the SARFASI Act. Since jurisdiction of Civil Court is barred, the plaint was rightly rejected by applying the principles of nip in the bud - there are no jurisdictional error, illegality or perversity in both the orders impugned - the appellant has a remedy of appeal under Section 17 of the SARFASI Act, 2002 - there are no substantial question of law and reason to entertain this second appeal. Appeal dismissed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2349;ाग 1918 वर्गफेट में बने मकान में निवासरत है | आगे यह अभिवचन हे कि उक्त भ्रमि खसरा कृ0 1039 खसरा पंचशाला वर्ष 1959 में म्युनिसिपल कार्पोरेशन के नाम पद दर्ज थी और अब म०प्र0 राज्य में निहित है | वादपत्र की कांडिका 7 महत्वएूर्ण ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 2340;्ति खसरा कृ0 1093 का भाग हे | वादपत्र की कांडिका कृ0 09 इस प्रकार है -- "यह कि प्रतिवादी कृ0 2 से उक्त कथित सम्पत्ति क विरुद्ध प्राप्त ऋण प्रतिवादी कृ0 1 द्वारा अदा नहीं की गई है जिसके फलस्वरुप प्रतिवादी कृ0 2 नें सम्मत्ति कì ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 6;बध में लाया हे लेकिन चाहे गलत या सही .उम्त खसरा कृ0 1039 के भाग को ही खसरा क0 260 को अभिकाथित रुप से बताकर ऋण लिया गया हे | इस प्रकार खस्तरा कृ0 1039 का भाग वित्तय आस्तियों का प्रतिभ्रतिकरण एवं पुर्नगठन तथा प्रतिभूति हित का प& ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... urt shows that the said finding is based on the plaint averments itself. As per plaint averments, reproduced in the order of Court below, it is clear that the property in question as per the plaintiffs is part of khasra number 260 whereas as per bank it is part of khasra number 1039. The trial Court further opined that although plaintiff has brought the suit for khasra number 1039, the said khasra number was shown as khasra number 260 and loan was obtained. Thus, the trial Court has taken a decision on the basis of plaint averments itself and was not impressed with any factual defence taken by the bank. The trial Court rejected the plaint in the teeth of Section 34 of the SARFASI Act. Section 34 of SARFASI the Act reads as under: "34. Civil court not to have jurisdiction.- No civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which a Debts Recovery Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal is empowered by or under this Act to determine and no injunction shall be granted by any court or other authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this Act or under the Recovery of Debts Due to B ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
