Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (10) TMI 1483

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... was working in United Kingdom. The petitioner filed return of income in India for the assessment year 2020-2021 on 21.09.2020 showing the income earned in the foreign country, in which he claimed being TDS credit before United Kingdom, as FTC u/s 90. But the petitioner uploaded Form 67 with delay, which he suppose to upload while filing the return of income. As noted that Section 90, Section 90A and Section 91 of the Income Tax Act of 1961 have been drafted specifically to avoid the burden of double taxation. In the present case, even though the petitioner had not uploaded Form-67 while filing return of tax, later he uploaded the same with delay and that too due to Covid out break he was not able to get necessary documents from the foreign .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sment order and the said revision petition was rejected as not maintainable observing that it is beyond the period of limitation and the revisional authority cannot pass any orders as prayed for. Hence the petitioner filed the present writ petition. 3 Learned Senior Standing Counsel for the respondents would strongly oppose stating that the petitioner should have filed Form-67 along with ROI, which was filed on 21.09.2020, whereas, the petitioner filed Form-67 only on 08.10.22 after the lapse of a period of two years. Therefore the revisionsal authority has rightly rejected the claim of the petitioner and the writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 4 I have considered the rival submissions made on either side and perused the materials avai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... th his Indian Income-tax and claimed the benefits of foreign tax credit. However, the petitioner would submit that it is not mandatory. The rule cannot make anything mandatory and it can be directory in nature, that too before the assessment, the claim to avail the benefits of foreign tax credit is filed. Therefore, it would amount to due compliance under the Act. The petitioner referred to the Judgment of the hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. G.M.Knitting Industries (P.) Ltd. in Civil Appeal Nos.10782 of 2013 and 4048 of 2014 dated July 24, 2015, wherein it was held that Form 3AA is required to be filed along with the return of income to avail the benefit and even if it is not filed, but the same is filed during assessment pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... espondent to make reassessment by taking into consideration of the foreign tax credit filed by the petitioner on February 2, 2021. The respondent is directed to give due credit to the Kenya income of the petitioner and pass the final assessment order. Further, it is made clear that the impugned order is set aside only to the extent of disallowing of foreign tax credit claim made by the petitioner and hence, the first respondent is directed to consider only on the aspect of rejection of foreign tax credit claim within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6 This Court, by following the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, held that filing of foreign tax credit in terms of Rule 128 is only directory in natu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent by taking into consideration of the foreign tax credit filed by the petitioner. (ii) Upon production of proof with regard to the payment of a sum of Rs. 10,000/- as stated above, the respondent is directed to give due credit to the United Kingdom income of the petitioner and pass the final assessment order. Further, it is made clear that the impugned order is set aside only to the extent of disallowing of foreign tax credit claim made by the petitioner and hence, the respondent concerned is directed to consider only on the aspect of rejection of foreign tax credit claim within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 9 With the above directions, this writ petition is allowed. No costs. Consequently, the connec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates