Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (11) TMI 947

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Commission notes that the provisions of Section 3(1) of the Act read with Section 3(3) thereof have no manner of application in the factual matrix of the present case as Section 3(3) of the Act requires two or more enterprises engaged in identical or similar trade of goods or provision of services and even if they are not engaged in identical trade, they must be presumed to be part of an agreement if they participate or intend to participate in furthering such an agreement. Looking at the relationship among OPs and the facts and circumstances of the case, as detailed above, it is evident that provisions of Section 3(3) of the Act are not applicable. Further, the Commission is of the view that, for the applicability of Section 4 of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... KAKKAD MEMBER AND MR. DEEPAK ANURAG MEMBER Order under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, 2002 1. The Information in this matter has been filed by M/s Vande Mataram Cable TV Network ( Informant No. 1 ) and Jaipal Singh Gulati ( Informant No. 2 ) under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 ( Act ) against the Union of India through the Secretary, Information Broadcasting ( OP-1 ); the State of Chhattisgarh through its Principal Secretary, Home Department ( OP-2 ); the Principal Commissioner, Central GST and Central Excise Commissionerate ( OP-3 ); the Commissioner, Commercial Tax GST, Government of Chhattisgarh ( OP-4 ); Taranjeet Singh Hora ( OP-5 ); Gurucharan Singh Hora ( OP-6 ); M/s Grand Vision Television Network ( OP-7 ); M/ .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... year 2018, OP-5 and OP-6 got Informant-2 (Jaipal Singh Gulati) and other network operators/ inputters arrested based on a false police com- plaint. 6. Additionally, it has been stated in the Information that in the year 2020, a similar method was used to unlawfully and coercively seize the shares of Informant-1's partners, resulting in the expropriation of nearly Rs. Two crore from M/s Vande Mataram Cable TV Network through fraudulent financial practices. This was achieved by diverting all revenue to per- sonal business accounts while deliberately evading GST and other tax obligations. 7. The Informants have further alleged that OP-5 and OP-6 have also influenced OP-8 and OP-9 to disrupt the signal supply and withhold the pending carria .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... V signal inputs and to settle the outstanding carriage charges owed to Informant No. 1. Furthermore, they sought to restrain the remaining Opposite Parties from disrupting the informant s cable TV Multi-System Operations business in the Korba District, State of Chhattisgarh, in any manner. 12. The Commission considered the material available on record in its ordinary meeting held on 04.09.2024 and decided to pass an appropriate order in due course. 13. Having considered the averments and allegations made in the Information, the Commission observes that the core issue raised by the Informants arises from the purported unlawful seizure of shares and the monopolization of the cable TV network business in Chhattisgarh by the Opposite Parties (O .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, as detailed above, it is evident that provisions of Section 3(3) of the Act are not applicable. 15. Further, the Commission is of the view that, for the applicability of Section 4 of the Act and the examination of contravention thereof, it may be axiomatic to define a relevant market and assess the dominance of the entity alleged to be abusing its dominant position in such market. However, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the abuses as alleged, the Commission does not find it imperative to define a precise relevant market in the instant matter. Furthermore, the Commission notes that the Informants have alleged violation of Section 4 of the Act against all the OPs. The Commission observes that it is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates