2017 (8) TMI 1738

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s purchased by them and used for providing output service - HELD THAT:- The controversy raised in these Appeals and the questions of law are covered by our judgment in the case of VODAFONE INDIA LTD. VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI II [ 2015 (9) TMI 583 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] where it was held that 'Goods are neither capital goods' as defined in rule 2(a)(A) of the CENVAT C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X