9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (11) TMI 1238X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... embossed as Germany , Korea , etc. This basically would allow the importer to sell these filters to buyers who want to replace these filters with the original branded filters. Hence, we find that the value as shown in the invoice of the Chinese exporter cannot be accepted prima facie. The importer himself had volunteered to pay the differential Customs Duty as per the enhanced value arrived at by the Customs officials, but subsequently appears to have changed their stand and sought re-examination of the goods by the Chartered Engineer. There is nothing on record to indicate that the Chartered Engineer, who was also duly approved by the DGFT, has committed any mistake in examining the subject consignment and arriving at the value. Therefore, ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dered for examination and thereafter, it was found that the goods were of a much better quality i.e., made in Germany, South Korea, etc. Based on these findings, the value was enhanced and additional duty of Rs.25,23,360/- was demanded. 2. The importer/appellant vide their letter dated 14.06.2018 replied stating that the goods were manufactured in China, but were compatible with the Volvo, Deutz, Komatsu, Hyundai, etc., brand equipment; as per requests of importers, the brand name and country of origin were mentioned in these filters. After this, the importer requested for re-examination by a technical expert. 2.1. As per their request, a DGFT-approved Chartered Engineer was appointed to examine the goods, who has given his report stating t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... consignment. He submits that it is a fact borne on record that the overseas exporter had sent an e-mail stating that the goods were of Chinese origin and were not manufactured in other countries such as Thailand, Germany, Korea, etc., as is being claimed by the Revenue. Therefore, it is his contention that the enhanced value adopted by the Revenue is legally not tenable. 5.1. The Ld. Advocate for the appellant prays that the impugned order be set aside in toto and the present appeal be allowed. 6. The Ld. Authorized Representative of the Revenue takes us through the detailed findings given by the ld. adjudicating authority in the impugned order. He points out that, at the initial stage itself, after examination by the Customs Officials, th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... countries of origin embossed as Germany , Korea , etc. This basically would allow the importer to sell these filters to buyers who want to replace these filters with the original branded filters. Hence, we find that the value as shown in the invoice of the Chinese exporter cannot be accepted prima facie. 8.1. The importer himself had volunteered to pay the differential Customs Duty of Rs.25,23,360/- as per the enhanced value arrived at by the Customs officials, but subsequently appears to have changed their stand and sought re-examination of the goods by the Chartered Engineer. There is nothing on record to indicate that the Chartered Engineer, who was also duly approved by the DGFT, has committed any mistake in examining the subject consig ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
