2024 (11) TMI 1236

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... AT:- The appellants have not placed on record even the proof of dispatch of the letters and the Notice referred above, leave apart, the proof of service. More pertinently, while replying to the Demand Notice dated 26th April, 2017 issued by the respondent under Section 8 of the IBC, none of the letters and the Notice referred above have been referred to and relied upon. In the absence of the proof .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ort, the NCLAT ), New Delhi has dismissed a Company Appeal preferred by the first appellant against the order dated 31st July, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority by which an application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short, the IBC ) filed by the respondent was admitted. Earlier, the appeal was dismissed. Thereafter, there was a remand by this Court t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he NCLAT which clearly establish the existence of a dispute much before a Notice under Section 8 of the IBC was served. We find that the appellants have not placed on record even the proof of dispatch of the letters and the Notice referred above, leave apart, the proof of service. More pertinently, while replying to the Demand Notice dated 26th April, 2017 issued by the respondent under Section 8 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X