Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2024 (11) TMI 1378

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... reliance on the statement of the Village Headman. The statement of the Village Headman can at best only corroborate the stand which department based on evidence, if there were other compelling evidence. It was incumbent on the part of the Income Tax Department to have summoned the said Mr.Thangasamy of Alangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District and verified and confirmed whether the said person had indeed given the statement which was produced by the Appellant and if so whether the statement given by the said person was true or not. Although the department is governed by preponderance of probability and not by strict rules of evidence, yet it was incumbent to have secured the presence of the said person. They should have cross examined him before .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he sources for the investments made overlooking the material evidence filed for the sale of the casuarina trees while rejecting the said claim based on irrelevant materials and considerations? ii. Whether the Tribunal is correct in law in sustaining the entire amount of agricultural income as unexplained income even though the amount of Rs. 34,85,000/- was received in the previous year relating to the Assessment Year 2008-09 and not in the Assessment Year under consideration? iii. Whether the Tribunal is correct in law in sustaining the addition of Rs. 67,645/- based on the sworn statement while overlooking the retraction statement filed immediately thereafter? 2. This Tax Case Appeal is directed against the Impugned Order dated 20.06.2014 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... relating to the Assessment Year 2008- 09 and not in the Assessment Year under consideration? iii. Whether the Tribunal is correct in law in sustaining the addition of Rs. 67,645/- based on the sworn statement while overlooking the retraction statement filed immediately thereafter? i. Whether the Tribunal is correct in law in sustaining the assessment of agricultural income reported as unexplained income based on the enquiry report of the Income Tax Inspector which report was not provided to the appellant for rebuttal, proving and establishing the gross violation of the principles of natural justice as well as the perversity/misdirection in the decision rendered in relation thereto? 7. The facts are identical except that in the present case, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Village Headman. 13. The evidence which department has gathered is long after the felling of trees and sale by the appellant by placing reliance on the statement of the Village Headman. The statement of the Village Headman can at best only corroborate the stand which department based on evidence, if there were other compelling evidence. 14. It was incumbent on the part of the Income Tax Department to have summoned the said Mr.Thangasamy of Alangudi Taluk, Pudukottai District and verified and confirmed whether the said person had indeed given the statement which was produced by the Appellant and if so whether the statement given by the said person was true or not. 15. Although the department is governed by preponderance of probability and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ction 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as unexplained credit/unexplained money of the appellant are incorrect and are liable to the set aside. 20. Therefore, the substantial questions of law framed by us is answered in favour of the appellant assessee and against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Hence, this Tax appeal stands allowed. No costs. 10. The facts of the case of the appellant in this Appeal being almost identical to the facts of the case the appellant's husband in T.C.A.No.998 of 2015 against the Order passed in I.T.A.No.2257/Mds/2013, we find no reasons to take a different view in this Appeal. 11. Accordingly, we allow this Appeal and answered the substantial questions of law raised in favour of the appellant and against the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates