Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

Upholding Arbitral Autonomy: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Judicial Interference u/s 11

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rendering the arbitration agreement non-existent. 2. Core legal questions presented: * Whether the issue of "accord and satisfaction" can be examined by the referral court while deciding an application for appointment of an arbitrator u/s 11 of the Act. * What is the scope of judicial interference permissible at the stage of appointing an arbitrator u/s 11 of the Act? * What is the effect of the Supreme Court's decision in In Re: Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1966 and the Indian Stamp Act 1899 on the scope of powers of the referral court u/s 11 of the Act? ARGUMENTS PRESENTED The primary contentions of the parties were as follows: Appellant's Arguments: * T .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ce-competence restricts courts from interfering in matters pertaining to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal, as exclusive jurisdiction on those aspects vests with the tribunal itself. (Para 96-98) The Court discussed the significance of arbitral autonomy and the "right to arbitrate" as fundamental aspects of individual autonomy and liberty, citing renowned author Gary B. Born and international precedents. (Para 99-106) 2. Scope of Judicial Interference u/s 11 The Court analyzed the differences between Sections 8 and 11 of the Act, noting that while Section 8 empowers any judicial authority to refer parties to arbitration, Section 11 confers exclusive power upon the High Court and the Supreme Court. The standard of scruti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... arbitral tribunal, unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. The negative effect of competence-competence requires that matters falling within the exclusive domain of the arbitral tribunal should not be looked into by the referral court before the tribunal has had the opportunity to do so. (Para 116) The Court emphasized that by referring disputes to arbitration and appointing an arbitrator u/s 11, the referral court upholds the parties' original understanding to resolve disputes through arbitration. It does not dilute the sanctity of "accord and satisfaction" or allow the claimant to walk back on its contractual undertaking. (Para 117) 4. Evaluation of Precedents and Clarification The Court clarified its observations i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... affirmed the appointment of the arbitrator by the referral court. (Para 136) * The Court vacated the order staying the arbitration proceedings. (Para 137) * All legal contentions and objections available to the appellant were kept open to be taken up before the arbitrator. (Para 138) The legal principles established or applied in this judgment include: * Upholding the principle of arbitral autonomy and judicial non-interference in arbitral proceedings, in line with the scheme of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. * Limiting the scope of inquiry by the referral court u/s 11 to the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, without delving into the merits of the dispute or the validity of the agreement. * Recognizi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rine towards greater recognition of arbitral autonomy and minimal judicial interference. The judgment aligns with the modern principles of arbitration, emphasizing the parties' autonomy to resolve disputes through their chosen method and limiting the role of courts in the arbitral process. The Court extensively refers to international precedents and scholarly works, such as those by Gary B. Born, to highlight the significance of arbitral autonomy and the "right to arbitrate" as fundamental aspects of individual liberty and access to justice. The judgment also acknowledges the legislative intent behind the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, which aimed to restrict the scope of judicial interference at the sta .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates