9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (12) TMI 1149X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Chairman of the IPL governing body, a subcommittee of the BCCI - relief in this case is firstly against the BCCI on the ground that by-laws require the BCCI to indemnify the petitioner. HELD THAT:- In Zee Telefilms Ltd. Anr. Vs. Union of India Ors.[ 2005 (2) TMI 773 - SUPREME COURT] as held that the BCCI does not answer the definition of State within the meaning assigned to this term under Article ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eeks a writ of mandamus on the BCCI to pay this amount to the Enforcement Directorate (ED). No such mandamus can be issued. This petition is frivolous, and accordingly, we dismiss this petition with costs of Rs. 1,00,000/- payable to Tata Memorial Hospital. - M.S. SONAK JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. For the Petitioner: Mr Mohit Goyal, a/w Mr Gaurav Gopal (V.C.) i/b Wadia Ghandy Co.,. For the Respondent: No ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... es and Regulations; b) issue an ex-parte ad interim order directing the respondents to pay/deposit the penalty of Rs.10,65,00,000/- (Ten crores and sixty five lacs only) on behalf of Petitioner; c) grant Costs; and 4. The relief in this case is firstly against the BCCI on the ground that by-laws require the BCCI to indemnify the petitioner. 5. In Zee Telefilms Ltd. Anr. Vs. Union of India Ors. 200 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e reliefs are wholly misconceived. The adjudication authority under the FEMA has imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,65,00,000/- upon the petitioner. The petitioner now seeks a writ of mandamus on the BCCI to pay this amount to the Enforcement Directorate (ED). No such mandamus can be issued. 8. This petition is frivolous, and accordingly, we dismiss this petition with costs of Rs. 1,00,000/- payable to T ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
