9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (1) TMI 214X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... . Baktha Siromoni For the Respondents : Mr. V. Prashanth Kiran Government Advocate ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 09.11.2024 whereby the petitioner was directed to pay penalty of Rs.6,18,656/- as proposed in GST MOV 07 under Section 129(1)A of the CGST Act. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the goods were inspected ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 24. The petitioner appeared on 04.11.2024 before the respondent and filed its reply wherein it was submitted that the goods relating to Ashok Leyland as well as Havells India were contained in the container and the goods relating to Havells India was loaded on top of the goods belonging to Ashok Leyland and thus Havells India goods were unloaded at Kathirvedu to enable the petitioner to unload the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fore the appropriate authority in accordance with law. If any such request is made the same would also be considered and orders would be passed in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with regard to the merits of the case, it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the submission of the petitioner on its own merits and in accordance with law. Th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
