9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (12) TMI 853X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... T - HC X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rs approached this court in W.P.(C) Nos. 24765 and 24779 of 2008, which were disposed of under Ext.P5 judgment directing release of the goods on bank guarantee for differential value, as may be assessed, by the 3rd respondent. This was not done and according to the petitioners, the 2nd respondent, with a view to refrain from complying with the directions contained in Ext. P5, issued Exts. P6 and P ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ect of one portion of the consignment. 6. Having heard Mr .George Poonthottam, learned counsel appearing for petitioners and Mr. Tojan J. Vathikulam, learned counsel appearing for respondents, I am of the view that it would be appropriate that the adjudication proceedings stated to have been undertaken by the 2nd respondent, Commissioner of Customs, be completed at the earliest. 7. In the result ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... onal appearance of the importer for the purpose of adjudication. But if there is any difficulty on the part of the importer in doing so, then he is entitled to seek exemption from personal appearance or seek permission to appear through a counsel or through an authorised representative. Such appearance through an authorised representative or a counsel can be treated by the adjudicating authority a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
