9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (3) TMI 1239X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... malendu Ghose and Raja Ghosh, Advocates ORDER Nadira Patherya, J. In this 10F appeal the orders under challenge are dated 12 August,. 2013 Kishori Lal Agarwal v. Alliance Engg. (P.) Ltd. [2014] 3 Camp. LJ 300 (CLB)] and 27 January, 2014 Kishori Lal Agarwal v. Alliance Engg. (P.) Ltd. [2014] 3 Comp. LJ 296 (CLB)]. Before the Company Law Board, Company Petition No. 450 of 2011 was filed under se ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the order dated 12 August, 2013 on the ground that the Company Law Board had accidentally slipped or omitted to note that the original petition filed before it was also under section 111 of the 1956 Act. This Company Application No. 586 of 2013 was considered by the Company Law Board and was dismissed on 27 January, 2014 on the ground that Company Law Board had no power to rectify its own order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ection 10F is to be filed within sixty days and admittedly such sixty days has expired but within sixty days, an application was filed before the Company Law Board on which a decision has been taken. Therefore, this appeal filed cannot be thrown out at the threshold stage and, accordingly, is admitted. 4. No purpose will be served in keeping the said appeal pending. As the only issue involved is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
