9911796707
TMI Blog2024 (5) TMI 1510X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... heet of her High School Examination, 2020 and immediately she represented before the Respondent No. 5 i.e. Principal of the College and the District Inspector of Schools, Prayagraj submitted his report on 15.10.2020. This Court further finds that the Hon ble Supreme Court has passed the order dated 10.01.2022 passed in Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) No. 03 of 2020 [ 2022 (1) TMI 385 - SC ORDER] whereb ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Lal Pandey,Nishi Kant Chaturvedi,Ram Manohar For Respondent :- C.S.C. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing for Respondents No. 1 to 4. 2. Petitioner, through this writ petition, has challenged the order dated 28.2.2024 passed by the Addl. Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad U.P., Prayagraj, whereby petitioner's representation for c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner's application filed for correction of date of birth before Respondent No. 5 was well within the period of limitation of three years as provided under Regulation-7 of the Regulation framed under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has vehemently argued that even if it is assumed that the pe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... g Counsel has tried to defend the order dated 28.2.2024 passed by the Respondent No. 3 but could not deny that Hon'ble Supreme Court has passed the order dated 10.1.2022 whereby period from 15.3.2020 to 28.2.2022 has been directed to be excluded while counting the period of limitation. 7. I have considered the averments submissions advanced by the learned counsels appearing for the parties an ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... riod of three years limitation provided under Regulation-7 of the regulation framed under the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921. 8. In view of the aforesaid reasons, the order dated 28.2.2024 passed by the Respondent No. 3 cannot be allowed to sustain. 9. Accordingly, this writ petition is allowed. The order dated 28.2.2024 passed by the Respondent No. 3 is quashed. Matter is remitted to Res ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
