9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (2) TMI 1637X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Ranjit Kumar and Indu Malhotra, Sr. Advs. and Nar Hari Singh, Nalin Talwar, Vikas Mehta and Vivek Kohli, Advs. for RR No 11 in I.A. Nos. 4-6/2011 SLP (C) Nos. 19467-69/2007 and A.K. Ganguly, Sr. Adv. and Vivek Kohli and Yash Mishra, Advs. in I.A. Nos. 7-9/2011 SLP (C) Nos. 19467-69/2007, L. Nageshwar Rao, Sr. Adv. and Subramonium Prasad, Vivek Kohli and Yash Mishra, Advs. in I.A. Nos.13-15/11 SLP (C) Nos. 19467-69/2007, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. and Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Amit in I.A. Nos. 16-18/11 SLP (C) Nos. 19467-69/2007 and Narottam Vyas and B.D. Sharma, Advs. for RR No. 4 ORDER 1. These petitions are directed against order dated 29.8.2007 passed by the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court in a batch of cases whereby certai ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pared in terms of para 1 of the directions contained in order dated 07.12.2010. He also submitted that the Plastic Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 2011 which were published in the Gazette of India (Extraordinary 4.2.2011) including Clause 5(d) will, keeping in view of para 2 of the directions given by the Court, be enforced with effect from 1.3.2011. 4. Shri Ram Jethmalani, Senior Counsel appearing for the applicant (Respondent No. 16) in Interlocutory Application Nos. 19-21 of 2011 urged that implementation of para 4 of the directions given by the Court may be postponed till the prayer for stay of Rule 5(d) of the Rules notified on 4. 2.2011 is considered. 5. Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned Counsel appearing for the applicant i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... affidavit, if any, be filed within 10 days. 13. List the case on 13.04.2011. 14. In view of the above, the date already fixed for hearing i.e. 9.3.2011 shall stand postpone to 13.4.2011. I.A. Nos. 4-6 of 2011 in SLP (C) Nos.19467-19469 of 2007 15. Shri Ranjeet Kumar, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant says that his client may be permitted to withdraw the interlocutory applications. 16. The request of the learned Counsel is accepted and the applications are dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. Nos. 7-9 of 2011 in SLP (C) Nos. 19467-19469 of 2007 17. Shri A.K. Ganguly, learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant says that his client may be permitted to withdraw the interlocutory applications. 18. The request of the lear ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
