9911796707
TMI Blog1985 (4) TMI 69X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... textile manufacturing company seeks to challenge by this Petition the order of the second Respondent dated February 23, 1985 raising three demands in the sums of Rs. 7,64,330.71 for the period from July, 1983 to January, 1984, Rs. 2,78,677.92 for the period from November 15, 1983 to June, 1984 and Rs. 1,84,504.18 for the period from July, 1984 to September 1984, towards the excise duty, under Tar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of the application of the Petitioner company to permit cross-examination, the request was not only not heeded to but the assessment was made and the demands were raised which have been challenged in this Petition. 2. Having heard the learned advocates for both the sides, we are of the opinion that the second respondent ought to have permitted the Petitioner company, particular in the facts and c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r company will render all assistance and will not ask for any adjournment. The Learned Advocate for the Petitioners has assured us that the Petitioners will not ask for any adjournment and they will proceed with the cross-examination of the witnesses. In the circumstances, the impugned assessment order is set aside and the Assistant Collector is directed to decide the question afresh in accordance ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
