9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (3) TMI 246X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... HIGH COURT], wherein, this Court has categorically held that 'The orders impugned in all Writ Petitions are quashed insofar as it relates to the claim made by the petitioners for ITC which is barred by limitation in terms of Section 16 (4) of the CGST Act, 2017 but, within the period prescribed in terms of Section 16 (5) of the said Act'.
The order impugned in all Writ Petition is quashed insofar as it relates to the claim made by the petitioner for ITC which is barred by limitation in terms of Section 16 (4) of the CGST Act, 2017 but, within the period prescribed in terms of Section 16 (5) of the said Act - petition allowed. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... raints (as there was complete lock down due to outbreak Covid-19) health related ailments, fire accidents, they were unable to file GSTR-3B returns, which prompted them not raising their claim ITC in time before the prescribed date. Whereas, the respondent- Department without considering such vital aspects and that reasons for the delay is not deliberate, issued the show cause notices to the petitioners, proposing to reverse the ITC availed and went to the extreme level of confirming the proposals contained in the show cause notices by passing the impugned orders,whereby, the claim made by the petitioners for ITC was reversed and the petitioners have been directed to tax/penalty/interest. Aggrieved against the impugned orders, the petitione ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... be quashed. In this context, it would be apposite to refer to both Section 16(4) of the CGST Act, 2017, as well as amendment made to Section 16 (4) by interpolations of sub-sections 16 (5) and (6), and by insertion of sub-section (5) to Section 16, which are extracted herein under:- Section 16 (4) ''A registered person shall not be entitled to take input tax credit in respect of any invoice or debit note for supply of goods or services or both after the thirtieth day of November following the end of financial year to which such invoice or debit note pertains or furnishing of the relevant annual return, whichever is earlier.'' Section 16 (5) :- ''Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (4), in r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t relates to the claim made by the petitioners for ITC which is barred by limitation in terms of Section 16 (4) of the CGST Act, 2017 but, within the period prescribed in terms of Section 16 (5) of the said Act. ii) Therefore, the respondent-Department is restrained from initiating any proceedings against the petitioners by virtue of the impugned orders based on the issue of limitation. iii) In view of the fact that the impugned orders are quashed, the respondent-Department is directed to take immediate steps towards de-freezure of the concerned petitioners bank accounts, which have been freezed in furtherance of the impugned orders, by sending intimation to the concerned bankers. iv) In the event, in the interregnum, i.e. during t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... unsel for the petitioner would submit that the above said order will hold good for the present Writ Petition also and hence, prayed to dispose of the Writ Petition. The learned Government Advocate (Tax) for the respondent would fairly accede to the same. 5. In view of the above, this Court passes the following: i) The order impugned in all Writ Petition is quashed insofar as it relates to the claim made by the petitioner for ITC which is barred by limitation in terms of Section 16 (4) of the CGST Act, 2017 but, within the period prescribed in terms of Section 16 (5) of the said Act. ii) Therefore, the respondent-Department is restrained from initiating any proceedings against the petitioner by virtue of the impugned order based on the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
