TMI Blog2025 (3) TMI 656X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 1220 & 1221 of 2025 - - X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r passed by the first respondent directing the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed tax stands modified to 15%, which the petitioner has already deposited. X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... spondent to adjust the payment of 20% from and out of the refund payable by the Department, the first respondent vide the impugned order dated rejected the Stay Petition, which necessitated the petitioner to approach this Court. 3.1 The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner has already deposited 15% of the disputed tax and therefore, prays that the onerous conditio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... or stay. However, in the interregnum, since the petitioner has been insisted to pay 20% of the disputed tax, failing which, the petitioner would be faced with recovery proceedings, the petitioner requested the first respondent to adjust the payment of 20% from and out of the refund payable to the petitioner, however, the first respondent without considering such request, rejected the Petition for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|