2025 (3) TMI 656

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 220 & 1221 of 2025 - -
Income Tax
Honourable Mr. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy For the Petitioner : Ms. Parthika Devi for Mr. Richardson Wilson For the Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr. A.N.R. Jayaprathap Junior Standing Counsel ORDER Heard Ms. Parthika Devi learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, the learned Junior Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2. 2. The cha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e impugned order dated rejected the Stay Petition, which necessitated the petitioner to approach this Court. 3.1 The learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner has already deposited 15% of the disputed tax and therefore, prays that the onerous condition imposed by the first respondent requiring the petitioner to pay 20% of the disputed tax may be reduced to 15%. 4. The .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ch, the petitioner would be faced with recovery proceedings, the petitioner requested the first respondent to adjust the payment of 20% from and out of the refund payable to the petitioner, however, the first respondent without considering such request, rejected the Petition for Stay. However, considering the fact that the petitioner has already deposited 15% of the disputed tax and finds the cond .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X