1987 (6) TMI 54

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s - Refund
H. Suresh, J. [Oral Order]. - To tax and to please is not known to the Central Excise Department, despite clear judgments and guidelines from the Courts. This is one such case. 2. The petitioners were paying excise duty on aluminium dross and skimmings which were not even waste products. It appears, that by a judgment given by this High Court by Mr. Justice Lentin, in the matter of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... this item of aluminium dross and skimmings and expressly stated in the column under "remarks" that they were not liable to any excise duty and they referred to the decision of the Central Board of Excise and Customs. This classification was accepted by the department. Yet, they would not refund the excise duty paid by the petitioners. However, by a letter dated March 28, 1981 the Assistant Collect .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X