2025 (3) TMI 913

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re-Existing Dispute between the Parties or not - it was held by NCLAT that the dismissal of the application upheld, concluding that there was a pre-existing dispute between the parties and that the Code was not the appropriate forum for the claim. HELD THAT:- There are no reason to interfere with the impugned order - appeal dismissed.
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA And HON'BLE MR .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... application(s) seeking condonation of delay, if any, in accordance with the provisions of the limitation Act, 1963. Any observations made in the impugned order(s) for the purpose of rejection of the proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 would not come in the way of the adjudication of the suit(s) which ought to be on the basis of the evidence on record. Pending application(s .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X