Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (3) TMI 1191

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al, Mr. Preshit Surshe, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Ganesh Ramani, Advocate for IRP JUDGMENT Ashok Bhushan, J. This Appeal by a Suspended Director of the Corporate Debtor has been filed challenging the order dated 21.11.2024 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal) Mumbai Bench, Court-II admitting Section 9 application filed by the Operational Creditor- Respondent herein. 2. Brief facts necessary to be noticed for deciding the Appeal are:- 2.1. A Facility Agreement was entered between the Corporate Debtor- Sahara Hospitality Limited and the Operational Creditor- KTR Management Services Private Limited on 01.04.2018 with respect to the supply of manpower for performing various activities at the Hotel. Corporate De .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er was passed by this Tribunal. On the statement made by the Counsel for the Appellant that Appellant is ready to deposit the amount of Rs.8,22,82,004/- in two instalments of one month each, the interim order was passed directing IRP not to take any further steps in the CIRP except to ensure that the corporate debtor is run as a going concern. The interim order has been continued from time to time. 3. We have heard Shri Krishnendu Datta, Learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant and Shri Rahul Chitnis, Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1. IRP has also appeared. 4. Shri Krishnendu Datta, Learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant submits that there being pre-existing dispute between the parties, the Adjudicating Authority ought not to hav .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... d marked as Annexure "3" is an email dated 15th June, 2019 (10:45 IST) addressed by my client to your client describing various issues with respect to the operation of your client at our clients hotel. Vide email dated 20th June, 2019 (10:05 IST) your client has admitted pending work and other issues. In the said email your client has reiterated their position of wanting monies due to heavy liabilities and penalties being faced by them. Hereto annexed and marked as Annexure "4" is the email dated 20th June, 2019 (10:05 IST). 7. In view of all the documents produced, it is clear that a genuine and bonafied dispute exists between you and our Client with respect to the said Claim and this is in existence for a long time, and in any event, mu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ny substance. It is useful to extract paragraphs 8 to 13:- "8. That, on instructions, we further point out that it was only due to the relationship between the promoters of both the companies that no action was taken due to your inabilities till date by Our Clients. It may not be out of place to mention that your promoter has utilized the services of Our Client's hotel to the tune of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (Rupees Two Crores Only). 9. That it is further pertinent to point out that various meeting were conducted from time to time wherein the Parties had suggested to reconcile the accounts and the same was done only after you had agreed to improve on your services and upon deduction of the amounts for which you did not provide satisfactory .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uncalled for, illegal, unjust and bad in law and as such, we request you to withdraw the Demand Notice under reference at the earliest. 10. Present is a case where demand notice issued under Section 8 was replied and reply notice issued by the corporate debtor dated 28.01.2020 is clearly notice of dispute within the meaning of Section 9(5)(d). The Adjudicating Authority in the impugned order although has noticed the reply dated 28.12.2019 as well as earlier reply sent by the corporate debtor to the legal notice but has brushed aside the said reply relying on reconciliation meeting held on 16.10.2019. The reconciliation meeting is claimed on 16.10.2019 whereas the facility termination was effected on 26.12.2019 and demand notice was issued .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates