Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2025 (3) TMI 1451

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rai upholding the Order-in-Original No. 02/2015 dated 24.02.2015 confirming the demand of Service Tax and also imposing penalties under relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 (ACT). 2. Facts briefly stated are that the Appellant was discharging service tax on reverse charge basis in respect of services rendered by M/s. Project Management Inc, USA for the goods manufactured and exported by them for the period upto June 2008. However, they ceased to pay service tax from July 2008 in terms of Rule 3 of Taxation of Services (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006 which excluded service tax liability on the transactions carried out wholly outside India. It appeared to the department that the Appellant was liable to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... erting its immunity to tax on the ground that the service was performed by an overseas company and is thus beyond the reach of the Indian service tax net. 3.3 The Ld. Counsel submitted that the issue was no more res integra as the Tribunal had on the same issue for earlier periods in respect of the Appellant vide Final Orders No. 43100/2018 dated 10.12.2018 and No. 40428/2023 dated 13.06.2023 decided the matter in favor of the Appellants by setting aside the impugned orders. 4. The Ld. Authorized Representative Mr. N. Satyanarayanan representing the Department affirmed the findings in the impugned order and submitted that the Appellant is liable to pay service tax under reverse charge mechanism in terms of Section 66A ibid and hence the d .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ded as well as consumed outside India. Section 66A reads as under:- "66A. (1) Where any service specified in clause (105) of section 65 is,- a) provided or to be provided by a person who has established a business or has a fixed establishment from which the service is provided or to be provided or has his permanent address or usual place of residence, in a country other than India, and b) received by a person (hereinafter referred to as the recipient) who has his place of business, fixed establishment, permanent address or usual place of residence, in India, such service shall, for the purposes of this section, be the taxable service, and such taxable service shall be treated as if the recipient had himself provided the service in Ind .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y provided / performed outside India. The adjudicating authority has held that the said Rule would not be applicable to the appellant on the ground that the same would be applicable only when part of the services are performed in India. On reading of the Rule, it is clear that if the services which are mentioned therein are performed outside India, there is no liability to pay service tax. 7. The very same issue was considered by the Tribunal in the appellant's own case as reported in 2018 (11) TMI 1151 CESTAT, Chennai and observed as under:- "5. From the facts narrated above, it is seen that the appellants have provided clearing and forwarding services to the service recipient who is situated outside India. The Tribunal in the case of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ct in his assertion that since services have been wholly performed outside India, the activity will not be exigible to service tax by virtue of Rule 3 (ii) of the Taxation of Services (Provided from Outside India and Received in India) Rules, 2006. We find that the case laws relied upon fully support his assertion. Following the ratio already laid down, we find that the impugned order cannot sustain and will have to be 5 set aside, which we hereby do. Appeal is allowed with consequential relief, if any, as per law." (Emphasis supplied) 9. The learned AR has relied on the decision in the case of Paramount Communications Ltd. Vs. CCE, Delhi - 2019 (29) GSTL 322 (Tri. Del.). On going through the said decision, it is seen that the demand ha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates