Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1984 (7) TMI 86

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed exporters. 2. For the year 1978-79 the Government of India announced a scheme known as the "Cash Compensatory Support Scheme" (hereinafter the earlier Scheme) on exports of certain eligible products. Two of such eligible products were "Hair Oils perfumed" and 'Shampoo' included under the general heading "Toiletries and Perfumeries". The 1st petitioner had during the period 1st April 1978 to 31st March 1979 exported perfumed hair-oils and shampoo and thus became entitled to and received cash compensatory support in terms of the earlier Scheme. 3. For the year 1979-80 also the Government of India announced the Cash Compensatory Support Scheme (hereinafter the subsequent Scheme). And therein under the general heading "CHEMICALS AND ALLI .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ERIES" and in terms thereof the petitioners had also received cash assistance. Now, in the subsequent Scheme this item "Hair Oils perfumed" was not expressly or separately specified but there was Item 6 to the effect "Cosmetics and Toiletries, not specified elsewhere (excluding lipstick and shampoo)". One does not find "Hair Oils perfumed" specified elsewhere. Short question, therefore, is: Does the term "Cosmetics and Toiletries" include "Hair Oils perfumed"? Only if the answer is yes, will the petitioners be entitled to cash assistance under the subsequent Scheme. 6. Now, neither of these two Schemes defines 'Cosmetics' or 'Toiletries'. In the absence of any definition, the relevant terms must be construed not in a technical sense but a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... completely support the petitioners herein :- "Similarly, it is well-known that perfumed hair-oil is an item of cosmetic toilet requisite. This phrase has been the subject-matter of interpretation in two Supreme Court decisions reported in Sarin Chemical Laboratory v. Commissioner of Sales Tax and State of Gujarat v. Prakash Trading Co. (26 S.T.C. 339 30 S.T.C. 348 respectively). 'Hair-oil', as the expression itself indicates, is used for dressing hair. Its object is not only to keep the hair tidy, promote its growth, check baldness but also to beautify appearance. As such, there can hardly be any controversy that it is squarely covered by the entry 'cosmetics toilet requisites'." The case of the petitioners receives further suppo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... earlier Scheme from the subsequent Scheme indicates non-entitlement to the exporter of that particular item for cash assistance, then there was no reason to specifically mention and exclude item 'shampoo' from the subsequent Scheme when the same, exactly in the manner as and like perfumed hair-oils, had also stood deleted from the subsequent Scheme. The very fact that despite such specific deletion, shampoo was again specifically excluded from Item 6 in the subsequent Scheme indicates, to a considerable extent, that the said Item 6 "Cosmetics and Toiletries" while excluding shampoo did not intend to exclude perfumed hair-oils which thus continued to be an item the export of which entitled the exporters to cash assistance. Besides, if a gene .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... osmetics and Toiletries" not specified elsewhere in the subsequent Scheme. The petitioners would, therefore, be entitled to cash assistance in accordance with the said Scheme. There being no dispute on the amount of Rs. 9,72,312/-, no useful purpose would be served in sending back the proceedings and directing the concerned authorities to compute the cash assistance in question. Fair and just order would be to direct respondents Nos. 1 to 3 to pay to the petitioners the said sum of Rs. 9,72,312/- as cash assistance to which they are entitled under the subsequent Scheme. 12. In the result, this petition succeeds and the same is allowed. Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 are ordered and directed to pay to the petitioners the sum of Rs. 9,72,312/- bei .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates