9911796707
TMI Blog1991 (2) TMI 134X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... granted licence in 1964. It is engaged in manufacture of Mill Board/Straw Board etc. A certificate of exemption dated 29-7-1964 was granted by the Central Excise Collector, Kanpur to the petitioner. It exempted the petitioner "from payment of duty on the 125 M.T. of Straw Board or Pulp Board including Grey Board in a financial year." The petitioner says that he was availing of the said exemption and not paying any duty. While so, he was served with a notice of demand in Form D.D. 2 dated 26-7-1969/19-8-1969 calling upon him to pay a sum of Rs. 1,25,765/- towards the duty on Pulp Board manufactured by him. The petitioner says that he made a representation against the said demand but to no avail before the Collector, Central Excise (Appeals). ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pportunities, the petitioner has failed to produce any documentary/oral evidence in support of his case and, therefore, the demand raised against him is confirmed. 4. In the counter-affidavit filed by the respondents, it is stated that the petitioner was not really entitled to exemption and that he obtained the exemption by misrepresentation of facts and by playing fraud upon the authorities. Inasmuch as the exemption was obtained fraudulently, it is submitted, the said exemption was withdrawn. It is also submitted that a criminal complaint was also laid against the petitioner under Section 420 I.P.C. It is submitted that demand for duty was validly raised and that even after the earlier order the petitioner did not produce any material to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to adhere to the direction contained in the appellate order aforesaid, the order dated 17-7-1980 is liable to be quashed and is quashed herewith. The Assistant Collector shall hear the petitioner afresh and determine whether any duty is due from him and if so on what account and for what period. If the authorities find that there is an order of withdrawal of exemption and if such order is found to have been passed without notice to the petitioner, the same shall be treated as ineffective. In such a case the petitioner shall be called upon to explain why the exemption granted to him should not be withdrawn for the reasons to be specified in such notice. At such hearing and/or in pursuance of such notice, as the case may be it shall be open ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
