1992 (1) TMI 116

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. K.R. Thamizhmani for M/s. Narman Associates, advocates for the petitioner, in each of the petitions and of Mr. K. Jayachandran, Additional Central Government Standing Counsel on behalf of the Second Respondent the court made the following order :- These writ petitions have been filed for waiver of pre-deposit of a duty of Rs. 6,63,948.0 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o have directed them to deposit Rs. 1,00,000/- towards duty on or before 31-1-1992. It is true that the entire penalty has been dispensed with. But I am not satisfied that the Tribunal has exercised its discretion properly in this case by asking the petitioners to pre-deposit a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- considering the facts and circumstances of this case that both the petitioners are not financially .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X