1997 (4) TMI 90

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ow cause notices issued by the respondent Collector of Central Excise, Indore u/s. 11A of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (for short `the Act'). 2. Besides contesting the petitions on merits, Shri B.G. Nema, Counsel for the respondents, has raised preliminary objections as to the tenability of these petitions on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. He contends that the petiti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... M/s. Kalan Bros. v. Collector, Central Excise (M.P. No. 459/90), M/s. Alpine v. Collector of Central Excise (M.P. No. 473/90), M/s. S.K. Taose Co. v. Collector, Central Excise (M.P. No. 893/92), M/s. Shriram v. Collector, Central Excise (M.P. No. 1020/92), M/s. Precision Trading v. Collector of Central Excise (M.P. No. 1021/92) and M/s. Deal Deal v. Collector, Central Excise (M.P. No. 1022/92) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o well settled." 5. I thus decline to enter into the merits of the petition and dismiss the same leaving the petitioners free to raise all the contentions raised herein, before the respondent. In the event of adverse order, the petitioners may also have recourse to the appellate jurisdiction available under the Act. There shall be, however, no order as to the costs of these petitions. 6. Secur .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X